Teachers' Beliefs

We are not always fully conscious of what we believe, or think, about a particular concept, nor why; we often have a rather vague perception of our beliefs simply because we see them as internal, internalised and a part of us - why reflect on them if we feel they're right? They become as natural as breathing...and who reflects on their breathing except very occasionally?

And so it is with literature - or is it Literature with a capital 'L'? What's the difference?

For example, what do YOU think about the statements down this page?

And more importantly, how would you substantiate and justify your beliefs about any of them?

And more importantly still: are you fully aware of the consequences those beliefs have on your literature classes? In terms of text selection, questions to ask, goals of the lesson, involvement of the teacher, and involvement of the learners? In terms of testing, of measuring - in terms of your expectations and those of the learners?

Teachers' beliefs matter because they often stand in the way of making choices for others as opposed to making them for ourselves: if I believe Literature really means 'Great texts famous for their authorship, style and place in the canon', it will necessarily have an impact on the texts I give my learners, how I handle those texts and what I do with them, and it will have an impact on the freedom I allow my learners to take with those texts (and on mine).

Consider your own beliefs carefully - many of them are so ingrained we hardly ever think about them. And make sure you realise the consequences of those beliefs on your teaching.

What I think about when I think about literature

Where do you stand on the following statements? 

And what are the consequences of your stance?

Consider the consequences of those beliefs here